Comparative Density Functional Theory and Density Functional Tight Binding Study of Arginine and Arginine-Rich Cell-Penetrating Peptide TAT Adsorption on Anatase TiO2
Wenxuan Li, Konstantinos Kotsis, Sergei Manzhos

TL;DR
This study compares DFT and DFTB methods for modeling arginine and TAT peptide adsorption on TiO2, showing DFTB's efficiency and accuracy in electronic structure predictions for large bio-inorganic systems.
Contribution
It demonstrates that DFTB can effectively model bio-inorganic interfaces, outperforming DFT with GGA functionals in band alignment accuracy for large molecules.
Findings
DFTB agrees well with DFT on structures and conformers.
DFTB provides better band alignment than DFT with PBE functional.
DFTB is computationally more efficient and accurate for large bio-inorganic systems.
Abstract
We present a comparative Density Functional Theory (DFT) and Density Functional Tight Binding (DFTB) study of geometries and electronic structures of arginine (Arg), arginine adsorbed on the anatase (101) surface of titania in several adsorption configurations, and of an arginine-rich cell penetrating peptide TAT and its adsorption on the surface of TiO2. Two DFTB parameterizations are considered, tiorg-0-1/mio-1-1 and matsci-0-3. While there is good agreement in the structures and relative energies of Arg and peptide conformers between DFT and DFTB, both adsorption geometries and energies are noticeably different for Arg adsorbed on TiO2. The tiorg-0-1/mio-1-1 parameterization performs better than matsci-0-3. We relate this difference to the difference in electronic structures resulting from the two methods (DFT and DFTB) and specifically to the band alignment between the molecule and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
