The two gap transitions in Ge$_{1-x}$Sn$_x$: effect of non-substitutional complex defects
J. D. Querales-Flores, C.I. Ventura, J.D. Fuhr, R.A. Barrio

TL;DR
This study investigates how non-substitutional $eta$-Sn defects influence the electronic properties and phase transitions of Ge$_{1-x}$Sn$_{x}$ alloys, revealing their role in the indirect-to-direct gap transition and metallization.
Contribution
We extended electronic structure calculations to include non-substitutional $eta$-Sn defects using an effective cluster approach, providing new insights into the alloy's phase behavior.
Findings
Identification of the role of $eta$-Sn in the direct-gap phase range.
Description of the two fundamental gap transitions in Ge$_{1-x}$Sn$_{x}$.
Demonstration of the impact of complex defects on metallization.
Abstract
The existence of non-substitutional -Sn defects in GeSn was confirmed by emission channeling experiments [Decoster et al., Phys. Rev. B 81, 155204 (2010)], which established that although most Sn enters substitutionally (-Sn) in the Ge lattice, a second significant fraction corresponds to the Sn-vacancy defect complex in the split-vacancy configuration ( -Sn ), in agreement with our previous theoretical study [Ventura et al., Phys. Rev. B 79, 155202 (2009)]. Here, we present our electronic structure calculation for GeSn, including substitutional -Sn as well as non-substitutional -Sn defects. To include the presence of non-substitutional complex defects in the electronic structure calculation for this multi-orbital alloy problem, we extended the approach for the purely substitutional alloy by Jenkins and Dow [Jenkins and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
