Applying the expanding photosphere and standardized candle methods to Type II-Plateau supernovae at cosmologically significant redshifts: the distance to SN 2013eq
E.E.E. Gall, R. Kotak, B. Leibundgut, S. Taubenberger, W. Hillebrandt,, and M. Kromer

TL;DR
This study compares distance measurement methods for Type II supernovae at significant redshifts, applying and refining the expanding photosphere and standardized candle methods to SN 2013eq, and finds consistent distance estimates.
Contribution
The paper re-derives the EPM equations for high-redshift supernovae and compares it with the standardized candle method, providing refined distance estimates at cosmological scales.
Findings
EPM yields angular and luminosity distances consistent with each other.
Correcting flux and angular size for redshift effects is crucial at z=0.041.
Distance estimates from different methods agree within uncertainties.
Abstract
Based on optical imaging and spectroscopy of the Type II-Plateau SN 2013eq, we present a comparative study of commonly used distance determination methods based on Type II supernovae. The occurrence of SN 2013eq in the Hubble flow (z = 0.041 +/- 0.001) prompted us to investigate the implications of the difference between "angular" and "luminosity" distances within the framework of the expanding photosphere method (EPM) that relies upon a relation between flux and angular size to yield a distance. Following a re-derivation of the basic equations of the EPM for SNe at non-negligible redshifts, we conclude that the EPM results in an angular distance. The observed flux should be converted into the SN rest frame and the angular size, theta, has to be corrected by a factor of (1+z)^2. Alternatively, the EPM angular distance can be converted to a luminosity distance by implementing a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
