Knowing the unknowns: uncertainties in simple estimators of galactic dynamical masses
David J. R. Campbell (ICC Durham), Carlos S. Frenk (ICC Durham),, Adrian Jenkins (ICC Durham), Vincent R. Eke (ICC Durham), Julio F. Navarro, (Victoria, CIfAR), Till Sawala (Helsinki), Matthieu Schaller (ICC Durham),, Azadeh Fattahi (Victoria), Kyle A. Oman (Victoria)

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of simple dynamical mass estimators for galaxies using cosmological simulations, revealing intrinsic uncertainties and proposing a new estimator for improved precision.
Contribution
The paper tests existing mass estimators with simulations and introduces a new, more accurate estimator that reduces scatter in mass measurements of dispersion-supported galaxies.
Findings
Mass estimators recover galaxy masses with ~23-25% scatter.
Shape of stellar distribution is the main source of uncertainty.
New estimator reduces scatter to 20%, improving accuracy.
Abstract
The observed stellar kinematics of dispersion-supported galaxies are often used to measure dynamical masses. Recently, several analytical relationships between the stellar line-of-sight velocity dispersion, the projected (2D) or deprojected (3D) half-light radius, and the total mass enclosed within the half-light radius, relying on the spherical Jeans equation, have been proposed. Here, we make use of the APOSTLE cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of the Local Group to test the validity and accuracy of such mass estimators for both dispersion and rotation-supported galaxies, for field and satellite galaxies, and for galaxies of varying masses, shapes, and velocity dispersion anisotropies. We find that the mass estimators of Walker et al. and Wolf et al. are able to recover the masses of dispersion-dominated systems with little systematic bias, but with a 1-sigma scatter of 25 and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
