Thermal Pressures in the Interstellar Medium of the Magellanic Clouds
Daniel E. Welty (1), James T. Lauroesch (2), Tony Wong (3), Donald G., York (1) ((1) University of Chicago, (2) University of Louisville, (3), University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign)

TL;DR
This study measures thermal pressures in the cold interstellar gas of the Magellanic Clouds using neutral carbon excitation, revealing higher pressures than in the Milky Way, consistent with their lower metallicity and energetic activity.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed measurements of thermal pressures in the Magellanic Clouds' neutral gas using high-resolution spectra and compares these with Galactic and quasar absorption-line systems.
Findings
Thermal pressures are a few times higher than in Galactic cold clouds.
C I column densities are slightly lower relative to some other species compared to the Milky Way.
Pressures are consistent with models of low-metallicity, high-radiation environments.
Abstract
We discuss the thermal pressures () in predominantly cold, neutral interstellar gas in the Magellanic Clouds, derived from analyses of the fine-structure excitation of neutral carbon, as seen in high-resolution HST/STIS spectra of seven diverse sight lines in the LMC and SMC. Detailed fits to the line profiles of the absorption from C I, C I*, and C I** yield consistent column densities for the 3--6 C I multiplets detected in each sight line. In the LMC and SMC, (C I) is consistent with Galactic trends versus (Na I) and (CH), but is slightly lower versus (K I) and (H). As for (Na I) and (K I), (C I) is generally significantly lower, for a given (H), in the LMC and (especially) in the SMC, compared to the local Galactic relationship. For the LMC and SMC components with well determined column densities for C I, C…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
