Triggering and Delivery Algorithms for AGN Feedback
Gregory R. Meece, G. Mark Voit, Brian W. O'Shea

TL;DR
This paper compares different AGN feedback models, highlighting how thermal versus kinetic feedback affects gas condensation and the importance of resolution and jet precession in simulation outcomes.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of AGN feedback implementations, emphasizing the impact of feedback type, triggering mechanisms, resolution, and jet precession on simulation results.
Findings
Pure thermal feedback causes excessive cold gas condensation.
Larger accretion zones lead to steadier jets but may increase cold-gas condensation.
Larger jet precession angles thermalize energy closer to the AGN.
Abstract
We compare several common sub-grid implementations of AGN feedback, focusing on the effects of different triggering mechanisms and the differences between thermal and kinetic feedback. Our main result is that pure thermal feedback that is centrally injected behaves differently from feedback with even a small kinetic component. Specifically, pure thermal feedback results in excessive condensation and smothering of the AGN by cold gas because the feedback energy does not propagate to large enough radii. We do not see large differences between implementations of different triggering mechanisms, as long as the spatial resolution is sufficiently high, probably because all of the implementations tested here trigger strong AGN feedback under similar conditions. In order to assess the role of resolution, we vary the size of the "accretion zone" in which properties are measured to determine the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
