$L_{2,\mathbb{Z}} \otimes L_{2,\mathbb{Z}}$ does not embed in $L_{2,\mathbb{Z}}$
Nathan Brownlowe, Adam P W S{\o}rensen

TL;DR
This paper proves that the tensor product of two Leavitt algebras over integers cannot be embedded into a single Leavitt algebra, using Thompson's group V to establish non-embedding results.
Contribution
It demonstrates the non-embedding of tensor products of Leavitt algebras into a single algebra, extending understanding of their algebraic structure and embeddings.
Findings
Tensor product $L_{2,bZ} ensor L_{2,bZ}$ does not embed into $L_{2,bZ}$.
Partial non-embedding results for $L_{2,R} ensor L_{2,R}$.
Use of Thompson's group V to analyze unitary groups in Leavitt algebras.
Abstract
For a commutative ring with unit we investigate the embedding of tensor product algebras into the Leavitt algebra . We show that the tensor product does not embed in (as a unital -algebra). We also prove a partial non-embedding result for the more general . Our techniques rely on realising Thompson's group as a subgroup of the unitary group of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
