A Set Theoretic Approach for Knowledge Representation: the Representation Part
Yi Zhou

TL;DR
This paper introduces a set theoretic framework for knowledge representation, demonstrating that minimal constructs can express complex logic operators and quantifiers, offering a foundational approach to formalize knowledge.
Contribution
It presents a novel set theoretic method that captures syntax and knowledge with minimal assumptions, extending it with definitions to encompass logic operators and quantifiers.
Findings
Primitive form is expressive enough to define logic operators.
Set theoretic constructs effectively formalize knowledge.
Extensions with definitions enhance expressiveness.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a set theoretic approach for knowledge representation. While the syntax of an application domain is captured by set theoretic constructs including individuals, concepts and operators, knowledge is formalized by equality assertions. We first present a primitive form that uses minimal assumed knowledge and constructs. Then, assuming naive set theory, we extend it by definitions, which are special kinds of knowledge. Interestingly, we show that the primitive form is expressive enough to define logic operators, not only propositional connectives but also quantifiers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
