Surveying Graduate Students' Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving
Andrew Mason, Chandralekha Singh

TL;DR
This survey study compares graduate students' attitudes towards problem solving in physics with those of undergraduates and faculty, revealing nuanced differences in expertise levels across different educational stages.
Contribution
It develops and validates a new survey instrument to assess attitudes towards problem solving among physics graduate students and compares their responses across different levels.
Findings
Graduate students' responses are less expert-like than faculty for introductory physics.
Graduate students' responses are more expert-like than undergraduates for introductory physics.
Graduate-level problem solving responses are similar to introductory students' responses.
Abstract
Students' attitudes and approaches to problem solving in physics can profoundly influence their motivation to learn and development of expertise. We developed and validated an Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving survey by expanding the Attitudes towards Problem Solving survey of Marx and Cummings and administered it to physics graduate students. Comparison of their responses to the survey questions about problem solving in their own graduate level courses vs. problem solving in the introductory physics courses provides insight into their expertise in introductory and graduate level physics. The physics graduate students' responses to the survey questions were also compared with those of introductory physics and astronomy students and physics faculty. We find that, even for problem solving in introductory physics, graduate students' responses to some survey questions are less…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
