The super-indeterminism in orthodox quantum mechanics does not implicate the reality of experimenter free will
Jan Walleczek

TL;DR
This paper clarifies that the concept of super-indeterminism in quantum mechanics does not imply that experimenters have free will, emphasizing that quantum indeterminism alone suffices for the theory's predictive success without metaphysical assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of super-indeterminism to distinguish the role of quantum indeterminism from metaphysical claims about free will in quantum mechanics.
Findings
Super-indeterminism clarifies the role of indeterminism in quantum theory.
Bell's notion of 'free variables' relates to uncomputable variables, not free will.
Quantum theory's predictive success does not depend on metaphysical free will assumptions.
Abstract
The concept of 'super-indeterminism' captures the notion that the free choice assumption of orthodox quantum mechanics necessitates only the following requirement: an agent's free-choice performance in the selection of measurement settings must not represent an exception to the rule of irreducible quantum indeterminism in the physical universe (i.e, "universal indeterminism"). Any additional metaphysical speculation, such as to whether quantum indeterminism, i.e., intrinsic randomness, implicates the reality of experimenter "freedom", "free will", or "free choice", is redundant in relation to the predictive success of orthodox quantum mechanics. Accordingly, super-indeterminism views as redundant also, from a technical standpoint, whether an affirmative or a negative answer is claimed in reference to universal indeterminism as a necessary precondition for experimenter freedom.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
