Analysis of Cohesive Microsized Particle Packing Structure Using History-Dependent Contact Models

TL;DR

This study investigates how cohesive micro-sized particles with different size distributions pack together, using DEM simulations to analyze the effects of cohesion, particle size, and distribution on packing density and force networks.

Contribution

It introduces a detailed DEM simulation framework incorporating various forces and compares two history-dependent contact models for cohesive micro-particle packing analysis.

Findings

Particle size distribution significantly affects packing density.

Cohesive effects have minimal impact on coordination number.

Different contact models yield similar results for porosity and force distribution.

Abstract

Granular packing structures of cohesive micro-sized particles with different sizes and size distributions, including mono-sized, uniform and Gaussian distribution, are investigated by using two different history dependent contact models with Discrete Element Method (DEM). The simulation is carried out in the framework of LIGGGHTS which is a DEM simulation package extended based on branch of granular package of widely used open-source code LAMMPS. Contact force caused by translation and rotation, frictional and damping forces due to collision with other particles or container boundaries, cohesive force, van der Waals force, and gravity are considered. The radial distribution functions (RDFs), force distributions, porosities, and coordination numbers under cohesive and non-cohesive conditions are reported. The results indicate that particle size and size distributions have great influences on the packing density for particle packing under cohesive effect: particles with Gaussian distribution have the lowest packing density, followed by the particles with uniform distribution; the particles with mono-sized distribution have the highest packing density. It is also found that cohesive effect to the system does not significantly affect the coordination number that mainly depends on the particle size and size distribution. Although the magnitude of net force distribution is different, the results for porosity, coordination number and mean value of magnitude of net force do not vary significantly between the two contact models.