Optical Response of Strained- and Unstrained-Silicon Cold-Electron Bolometers
T. L. R. Brien, P. A. R. Ade, P. S. Barry, C. J. Dunscombe, D. R., Leadley, D. V. Morozov, M. Myronov, E. H. C. Parker, M. J. Prest, M., Prunnila, R. V. Sudiwala, T. E. Whall, P. D. Mauskopf

TL;DR
This study compares the optical response and noise performance of strained and unstrained silicon cold-electron bolometers, demonstrating improved sensitivity in the strained device limited by photon noise.
Contribution
It introduces a novel measurement method and provides the first comparison of strained versus unstrained silicon bolometers for 160-GHz radiation detection.
Findings
Strained silicon bolometer has lower noise-equivalent power than unstrained.
Noise in the strained device is limited by photon noise.
Both devices successfully detect 160-GHz radiation with high sensitivity.
Abstract
We describe the optical characterisation of two silicon cold-electron bolometers each consisting of a small () island of degenerately doped silicon with superconducting aluminium contacts. Radiation is coupled into the silicon absorber with a twin-slot antenna designed to couple to 160-GHz radiation through a silicon lens.The first device has a highly doped silicon absorber, the second has a highly doped strained-silicon absorber.Using a novel method of cross-correlating the outputs from two parallel amplifiers, we measure noise-equivalent powers of and for the control and strained device, respectively, when observing radiation from a 77-K source. In the case of the strained device, the noise-equivalent power is limited by the photon noise.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
