The XXL Survey: VI. The 1000 brightest X-ray point sources
S. Fotopoulou, F. Pacaud, S. Paltani, P. Ranalli, M. E. Ramos-Ceja, L., Faccioli, M. Plionis, C. Adami, A. Bongiorno, M. Brusa, L. Chiappetti, S., Desai, A. Elyiv, C. Lidman, O. Melnyk, M. Pierre, E. Piconcelli, C. Vignali,, S. Alis, F. Ardila, S. Arnouts, I. Baldry, M. Bremer

TL;DR
The XXL Survey's first release of the 1000 brightest X-ray point sources provides new insights into AGN properties, their luminosity function, and large-scale structures, bridging the gap between deep and wide-area X-ray surveys.
Contribution
This paper presents the first XXL point source catalogue in the 2-10 keV band, with improved redshift estimation, spectral modeling, and large-scale structure detection, expanding understanding of AGN evolution.
Findings
Average photon index $\Gamma=1.85$ for AGN spectra.
26% of sources are absorbed with $\log N_H > 22$.
Number counts extend COSMOS survey results to higher fluxes.
Abstract
X-ray extragalactic surveys are ideal laboratories for the study of the evolution and clustering of active galactic nuclei (AGN). The XXL Survey spans two fields of a combined 50 observed for more than 6Ms with XMM-Newton, occupying the parameter space between deep surveys and very wide area surveys; at the same time it benefits from a wealth of ancillary data. This paper marks the first release of the XXL point source catalogue selected in the 2-10 keV energy band with limiting flux . We use both public and proprietary data sets to identify the counterparts of the X-ray point-like sources and improved upon the photometric redshift determination for AGN by applying a Random Forest classification trained to identify for each object the optimal photometric redshift model library. We also assign a probability to each source to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
