Deep 3 GHz Observations of the Lockman Hole North with the Very Large Array - 1. Source extraction and uncertainty analysis
Tessa Vernstrom, Douglas Scott, Jasper Wall, Jim Condon, Bill Cotton,, Rick Perley

TL;DR
This paper evaluates source-finding accuracy and systematic effects in deep 3-GHz radio observations of the Lockman Hole North, comparing routines and resolutions, and explores machine learning for improved source de-blending.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of source extraction uncertainties, compares two source-finding routines, and demonstrates machine learning's potential to enhance source de-blending in radio surveys.
Findings
OBIT slightly outperforms AEGEAN in de-blending.
30-70% of sources are missed or inaccurately fitted at larger sizes.
Machine learning correctly identifies blended sources up to 90% of the time.
Abstract
This is the first of two papers describing the observations and cataloguing of deep 3-GHz observations of the Lockman Hole North using the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array. The aim of this paper is to investigate, through the use of simulated images, the uncertainties and accuracy of source-finding routines, as well as to quantify systematic effects due to resolution, such as source confusion and source size. While these effects are not new, this work is intended as a particular case study that can be scaled and translated to other surveys. We use the simulations to derive uncertainties in the fitted parameters, as well as bias corrections for the actual catalogue (presented in Paper 2). We compare two different source-finding routines, OBIT and AEGEAN, and two different effective resolutions, 8 and 2.75 arcsec. We find that the two routines perform comparably well, with OBIT being…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
