Ages of massive galaxies at $0.5 < z < 2.0$ from 3D-HST rest-frame optical spectroscopy
Mattia Fumagalli, Marijn Franx, Pieter van Dokkum, Katherine E., Whitaker, Rosalind E. Skelton, Gabriel Brammer, Erica Nelson, Michael Maseda,, Ivelina Momcheva, Mariska Kriek, Ivo Labb\'e, Britt Lundgren, Hans-Walter Rix

TL;DR
This study analyzes the ages of massive galaxies between redshifts 0.5 and 2.0 using stacked near-infrared spectra from the 3D-HST survey, comparing stellar population models to understand galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It provides a systematic analysis of rest-frame optical spectra of massive galaxies up to z=2, evaluating different stellar population models and their implications for galaxy ages.
Findings
FSPS-C3K model fits quiescent galaxies best
Stellar ages of quiescent galaxies range from 4 to 1.5 Gyr across redshifts
Ages are roughly half the Universe's age at these redshifts
Abstract
We present low-resolution near-infrared stacked spectra from the 3D-HST survey up to and fit them with commonly used stellar population synthesis models: BC03 (Bruzual & Charlot, 2003), FSPS10 (Flexible Stellar Population Synthesis, Conroy & Gunn 2010), and FSPS-C3K (Conroy, Kurucz, Cargile, Castelli, in prep). The accuracy of the grism redshifts allows the unambiguous detection of many emission and absorption features, and thus a first systematic exploration of the rest-frame optical spectra of galaxies up to . We select massive galaxies (), we divide them into quiescent and star-forming via a rest-frame color-color technique, and we median-stack the samples in 3 redshift bins between and . We find that stellar population models fit the observations well at wavelengths below rest-frame, but show systematic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
