Hubble Space Telescope: Snapshot Survey for Resolved Companions of Galactic Cepheids
Nancy Remage Evans, Howard E. Bond, Gail H. Schaefer, Brian D. Mason,, Evan Tingle, Margarita Karovska, and Ignazio Pillitteri

TL;DR
This study used Hubble Space Telescope imaging and follow-up X-ray observations to identify and analyze resolved companions of Galactic Cepheids, finding a low occurrence of wide physical companions and providing insights into star formation and dynamical evolution.
Contribution
First comprehensive survey combining optical and X-ray data to identify resolved companions of Galactic Cepheids, constraining binary frequency and properties.
Findings
Only 3% of Cepheids have wide companions based on optical and X-ray data.
No physical companions found beyond 4,000 AU, except in cluster or association members.
Low frequency of wide companions constrains star formation and dynamical evolution models.
Abstract
We have conducted an imaging survey with the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Camera~3 (WFC3) of 70 Galactic Cepheids, typically within 1~kpc, with the aim of finding resolved physical companions. The WFC3 field typically covers the 0.1 pc area where companions are expected. In this paper, we identify 39 Cepheids having candidate companions, based on their positions in color--magnitude diagrams, and having separations 5 from the Cepheids. We use follow-up observations of 14 of these candidates with XMM-Newton, and of one of them with ROSAT, to separate X-ray-active young stars (probable physical companions) from field stars (chance alignments). Our preliminary estimate, based on the optical and X-ray observations, is that only 3\% of the Cepheids in the sample have wide companions. Our survey easily detects resolved main-sequence companions as faint as spectral type K\null.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
