The critical mass ratio of double white dwarf binaries for violent merger-induced Type Ia supernova explosions
Yushi Sato, Naohito Nakasato, Ataru Tanikawa, Ken'ichi Nomoto, Keiichi, Maeda, Izumi Hachisu

TL;DR
This paper refines the critical mass ratio for violent mergers of double white dwarfs leading to Type Ia supernovae, using hydrodynamical simulations, and assesses implications for supernova brightness and specific binary systems.
Contribution
The study provides a more stringent critical mass ratio for violent WD mergers based on SPH simulations, considering initial conditions, and evaluates its impact on supernova brightness distribution and the fate of a specific binary system.
Findings
New critical mass ratio (qcr) derived from SPH simulations.
qcr is mainly affected by initial conditions like WD spin.
Final fate of the binary system Henize 2-428 is likely a sub-Chandrasekhar mass SN Ia.
Abstract
Mergers of carbon-oxygen (CO) white dwarfs (WDs) are considered as one of the potential progenitors of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). Recent hydrodynamical simulations showed that the less massive (secondary) WD violently accretes onto the more massive (primary) one, carbon detonation occurs, the detonation wave propagates through the primary, and the primary finally explodes as a sub-Chandrasekhar mass SN Ia. Such an explosion mechanism is called the violent merger scenario. Based on the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations of merging CO WDs, we derived more stringent critical mass ratio (qcr) leading to the violent merger scenario than the previous results. We conclude that this difference mainly comes from the differences in the initial condition, synchronously spinning of WDs or not. Using our new results, we estimated the brightness distribution of SNe Ia in the violent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
