Finiteness and Computation in Toposes
Edward Hermann Haeusler (Puc-Rio)

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the concept of finiteness in toposes without the Axiom of Choice or Natural Numbers Object affects computation models, revealing unexpected computational properties from an external perspective.
Contribution
It introduces a new perspective on finiteness-based computation in toposes lacking NNO and AC, highlighting external phenomena like infinite programs and branching.
Findings
External observers see non-standard computational behaviors
Finiteness notions vary without Axiom of Choice
Unexpected infinite structures emerge in topos-based computation
Abstract
Some notions in mathematics can be considered relative. Relative is a term used to denote when the variation in the position of an observer implies variation in properties or measures on the observed object. We know, from Skolem theorem, that there are first-order models where the set of real numbers is countable and some where it is not. This fact depends on the position of the observer and on the instrument/language the obserevr uses as well, i.e., it depends on whether he/she is inside the model or not and in this particular case the use of first-order logic. In this article, we assume that computation is based on finiteness rather than natural numbers and discuss Turing machines computable morphisms defined on top of the sole notion finiteness. We explore the relativity of finiteness in models provided by toposes where the Axiom of Choice (AC) does not hold, since Tarski proved that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
