The Carnegie-Irvine Galaxy Survey. IV. A Method to Determine the Average Mass Ratio of Mergers That Built Massive Elliptical Galaxies
Song Huang (1), Luis C. Ho (2,3), Chien Y. Peng (4), Zhao-Yu Li (5),, Aaron J. Barth (6) ((1) Kavli-IPMU (WPI), University of Tokyo, (2) Kavli, Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, (3) Peking University, (4) GMTO,, (5) Shanghai Astronomical Observatory

TL;DR
This paper introduces a photometric method to estimate the average mass ratio of mergers that formed massive elliptical galaxies, supporting the two-phase formation scenario with minor mergers being dominant.
Contribution
It proposes a new, straightforward photometric approach to determine the average merger mass ratio in massive ellipticals, based on light decomposition and color analysis.
Findings
Estimated merger mass ratio of 1:5 to 1:10.
Minor mergers largely contributed to the outer envelope growth.
Method aligns with two-phase galaxy formation models.
Abstract
Many recent observations and numerical simulations suggest that nearby massive, early-type galaxies were formed through a "two-phase" process. In the proposed second phase, the extended stellar envelope was accumulated through many dry mergers. However, details of the past merger history of present-day ellipticals, such as the typical merger mass ratio, are difficult to constrain observationally. Within the context and assumptions of the two-phase formation scenario, we propose a straightforward method, using photometric data alone, to estimate the average mass ratio of mergers that contributed to the build-up of massive elliptical galaxies. We study a sample of nearby massive elliptical galaxies selected from the Carnegie-Irvine Galaxy Survey, using two-dimensional analysis to decompose their light distribution into an inner, denser component plus an extended, outer envelope, each…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
