Flies as Ship Captains? Digital Evolution Unravels Selective Pressures to Avoid Collision in Drosophila
Ali Tehrani-Saleh, Christoph Adami

TL;DR
This study investigates how Drosophila flies avoid collisions by using optic flow cues, revealing that such strategies can evolve under specific conditions in digital simulations, but may not fully explain real fly behavior.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that collision avoidance strategies based on optic flow can evolve in digital models when conditions are ideal, providing insights into sensory-driven behavior evolution.
Findings
Optic flow cues influence collision avoidance in flies.
The strategy evolves in digital models under specific cost/benefit ratios.
Real flies may require additional factors for such strategies to develop.
Abstract
Flies that walk in a covered planar arena on straight paths avoid colliding with each other, but which of the two flies stops is not random. High-throughput video observations, coupled with dedicated experiments with controlled robot flies have revealed that flies utilize the type of optic flow on their retina as a determinant of who should stop, a strategy also used by ship captains to determine which of two ships on a collision course should throw engines in reverse. We use digital evolution to test whether this strategy evolves when collision avoidance is the sole penalty. We find that the strategy does indeed evolve in a narrow range of cost/benefit ratios, for experiments in which the "regressive motion" cue is error free. We speculate that these stringent conditions may not be sufficient to evolve the strategy in real flies, pointing perhaps to auxiliary costs and benefits not…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
