A spatial model for selection and cooperation
Peter Czuppon, Peter Pfaffelhuber

TL;DR
This paper models the evolution of cooperation using an extended biased voter model, revealing a phase transition at the point where cooperation benefits outweigh defection bias, with implications for understanding cooperative behavior.
Contribution
It introduces a spatial model extending the biased voter model to include cooperation benefits, demonstrating a phase transition in one-dimensional systems.
Findings
Cooperators die out when defector bias exceeds cooperation benefit.
Cooperation prevails when benefits outweigh defector bias.
A phase transition occurs at the point where bias equals cooperation benefit.
Abstract
We study the evolution of cooperation in an interacting particle system with two types. The model we investigate is an extension of a two-type biased voter model. One type (called defector) has a (positive) bias with respect to the other type (called cooperator). However, a cooperator helps a neighbor (either defector or cooperator) to reproduce at rate . We prove that the one-dimensional nearest-neighbor interacting dynamical system exhibits a phase transition at . For cooperators always die out, but if , cooperation is the winning strategy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
