Probing Theories of Gravity with Phase Space-Inferred Potentials of Galaxy Clusters
Alejo Stark, Christopher J. Miller, Nicholas Kern, Daniel Gifford,, Gong-Bo Zhao, Baojiu Li, Kazuya Koyama, and Robert C. Nichol

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel method using phase space analysis of galaxy clusters to test modified gravity theories, specifically Chameleon f(R) gravity, achieving significantly improved constraints over current methods.
Contribution
The authors develop a new probe comparing high and low mass galaxy clusters' escape velocities to test gravity theories, validated with simulations and applicable to DESI data.
Findings
Enhanced escape edges in low mass clusters indicate deviations from GR under f(R) gravity.
The method can distinguish GR from f(R) models at high significance with DESI data.
Constraints on |fR0| are improved by over an order of magnitude compared to existing limits.
Abstract
Modified theories of gravity provide us with a unique opportunity to generate innovative tests of gravity. In Chameleon f(R) gravity, the gravitational potential differs from the weak-field limit of general relativity (GR) in a mass dependent way. We develop a probe of gravity which compares high mass clusters, where Chameleon effects are weak, to low mass clusters, where the effects can be strong. We utilize the escape velocity edges in the radius/velocity phase space to infer the gravitational potential profiles on scales of 0.3-1 virial radii. We show that the escape edges of low mass clusters are enhanced compared to GR, where the magnitude of the difference depends on the background field value |fR0|. We validate our probe using N-body simulations and simulated light cone galaxy data. For a DESI (Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument) Bright Galaxy Sample, including observational…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
