Comment on "Catalytic Coherence"
Salil Bedkihal, Joan Vaccaro, Stephen Barnett

TL;DR
This paper critiques a claim that a quantum reservoir's coherence can be reused indefinitely without loss, demonstrating that repeated use reduces accuracy and increases thermodynamic costs, impacting quantum thermodynamics applications.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing that the repeated use of a coherence reservoir diminishes accuracy and incurs higher thermodynamic costs, countering prior claims.
Findings
Repeated use of the reservoir reduces the coherence accuracy.
Thermodynamic costs increase with each use.
Prior claims of unlimited coherence reuse are invalid.
Abstract
Aberg has claimed in a recent Letter," Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 150402 (2014)", that the coherence of a reservoir can be used repeatedly to perform coherent operations without ever diminishing in power to do so. The claim has particular relevance for quantum thermodynamics because, as shown in "Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 150402 (2014)", latent energy that is locked by coherence may be extractable without incurring any additional cost. We show here, however, that repeated use of the reservoir gives an overall coherent operation of diminished accuracy and is necessarily accompanied by an increased thermodynamic cost.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
