Departure from the constant-period ephemeris for the transiting exoplanet WASP-12 b
G. Maciejewski, D. Dimitrov, M. Fern\'andez, A. Sota, G. Nowak, J., Ohlert, G. Nikolov, {\L}. Bukowiecki, T. C. Hinse, E. Pall\'e, B. Tingley, D., Kjurkchieva, J. W. Lee, C.-U. Lee

TL;DR
This study analyzes precise transit timings of exoplanet WASP-12 b over several years, revealing a departure from constant-period predictions likely due to orbital decay or precession, with implications for star-planet interaction models.
Contribution
The paper provides new transit observations and refines the ephemeris, demonstrating orbital period change and evaluating models of orbital decay versus precession for WASP-12 b.
Findings
Transit times deviate from linear ephemeris at 5 sigma confidence
Orbital period decreasing at approximately 0.0256 seconds per year
Orbital decay model is statistically favored over precession model
Abstract
Most hot Jupiters are expected to spiral in towards their host stars due to transfering of the angular momentum of the orbital motion to the stellar spin. Their orbits can also precess due to planet-star interactions. Calculations show that both effects could be detected for the very-hot exoplanet WASP-12 b using the method of precise transit timing over a timespan of the order of 10 yr. We acquired new precise light curves for 29 transits of WASP-12 b, spannning 4 observing seasons from November 2012 to February 2016. New mid-transit times, together with literature ones, were used to refine the transit ephemeris and analyse the timing residuals. We find that the transit times of WASP-12 b do not follow a linear ephemeris with a 5 sigma confidence level. They may be approximated with a quadratic ephemeris that gives a rate of change in the orbital period of -2.56 +/- 0.40 x 10^{-2}…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
