On Perception and Reality in Wireless Air Traffic Communications Security
Martin Strohmeier, Matthias Sch\"afer, Rui Pinheiro, Vincent Lenders,, Ivan Martinovic

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the security vulnerabilities of wireless air traffic communication technologies, bridging the gap between academic research and aviation industry perspectives through systematization, expert surveys, and attack analysis.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive systematization of wireless aviation applications, analyzes vulnerabilities and countermeasures, and surveys aviation experts to align security research with industry needs.
Findings
Wireless technologies in aviation are inherently insecure due to design limitations.
Aviation experts show limited awareness of wireless security vulnerabilities.
Categorization of short-term and long-term security approaches.
Abstract
More than a dozen wireless technologies are used by air traffic communication systems during different flight phases. From a conceptual perspective, all of them are insecure as security was never part of their design. Recent contributions from academic and hacking communities have exploited this inherent vulnerability to demonstrate attacks on some of these technologies. However, not all of these contributions have resonated widely within aviation circles. At the same time, the security community lacks certain aviation domain knowledge, preventing aviation authorities from giving credence to their findings. In this paper, we aim to reconcile the view of the security community and the perspective of aviation professionals concerning the safety of air traffic communication technologies. To achieve this, we first provide a systematization of the applications of wireless technologies upon…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
