Macro vs. Micro Methods in Non-Life Claims Reserving (an Econometric Perspective)
Arthur Charpentier, Mathieu Pigeon

TL;DR
This paper compares macro and micro econometric models for non-life claims reserving, analyzing their theoretical properties and practical performance to understand their uncertainty estimates and effectiveness.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of macro and micro econometric models, including theoretical insights and application to claims reserving data.
Findings
Micro models offer detailed insights into individual claims.
Macro models are effective for aggregate reserve estimation.
Both models show comparable uncertainty estimates.
Abstract
Traditionally, actuaries have used run-off triangles to estimate reserve ("macro" models, on agregated data). But it is possible to model payments related to individual claims. If those models provide similar estimations, we investigate uncertainty related to reserves, with "macro" and "micro" models. We study theoretical properties of econometric models (Gaussian, Poisson and quasi-Poisson) on individual data, and clustered data. Finally, application on claims reserving are considered.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProbability and Risk Models · Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management · Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
