Problems for the WELS classification of planetary nebulae central stars: Self-consistent nebular modelling of four candidates
Hassan M. Basurah, Alaa Ali, Michael A. Dopita, R. Alsulami, Morsi A., Amer, and A. Alruhaili

TL;DR
This study uses integral field spectroscopy and self-consistent photoionization modeling to analyze four planetary nebulae with supposed weak emission-line central stars, revealing that the WELS classification may be spurious and that emission lines originate from nebular gas.
Contribution
It provides the first spatially-resolved analysis of WELS candidates, challenging the WELS classification and offering detailed nebular models and chemical abundances.
Findings
WELS lines originate in nebular gas, not central stars
Three nebulae are hydrogen-rich O(H)-type
All four nebulae are high excitation, optically-thin, with similar evolutionary stages
Abstract
We present integral field unit (IFU) spectroscopy and self-consistent photoionisation modelling for a sample of four southern Galactic planetary nebulae (PNe) with supposed weak emission-line (WEL) central stars. The Wide Field Spectrograph (WiFeS) on the ANU 2.3 m telescope has been used to provide IFU spectroscopy for NGC 3211, NGC 5979, My 60, and M 4-2 covering the spectral range of 3400-7000{\AA}. All objects are high excitation non-Type I PNe, with strong He II emission, strong [Ne V] emission, and weak low-excitation lines. They all appear to be predominantly optically-thin nebulae excited by central stars with K. Three PNe of the sample have central stars which have been previously classified as weak emission-line stars (WELS), and the fourth also shows the characteristic recombination lines of a WELS. However, the spatially-resolved spectroscopy shows that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
