The EPR Paradox Implies A Minimum Achievable Temperature
David M. Rogers

TL;DR
This paper explores the thermodynamics of repeatedly measuring quantum systems, establishing a minimum achievable temperature and redefining heat and work in this context, with implications for quantum computing and fluctuation theorems.
Contribution
It introduces a measurement-based thermodynamic framework that defines heat and work without full system measurement, revealing a fundamental temperature limit in quantum systems.
Findings
Most interactions prevent reaching absolute zero temperature.
Explicit formula for minimum temperature in repeated quantum measurements.
Measurement back-action counts as work, ensuring thermodynamic consistency.
Abstract
We carefully examine the thermodynamic consequences of the repeated partial projection model for coupling a quantum system to an arbitrary series of environments under feedback control. This paper provides observational definitions of heat and work that can be realized in current laboratory setups. In contrast to other definitions, it uses only properties of the environment and the measurement outcomes, avoiding references to the `measurement' of the central system's state in any basis. These definitions are consistent with the usual laws of thermodynamics at all temperatures, while never requiring complete projective measurement of the entire system. It is shown that the back-action of measurement must be counted as work rather than heat to satisfy the second law. Comparisons are made to stochastic Schr\"{o}dinger unravelling and transition-probability based methods, many of which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
