Theoretical uncertainty of the supersymmetric dark matter relic density from scheme and scale variations
J. Harz, B. Herrmann, M. Klasen, K. Kovarik, P. Steppeler

TL;DR
This paper assesses the theoretical uncertainty in the neutralino dark matter relic density due to scheme and scale variations, demonstrating that higher-order SUSY-QCD corrections can reduce this uncertainty to levels comparable with experimental errors.
Contribution
It provides the first quantitative analysis of scheme and scale uncertainties in dark matter relic density calculations, including the effects of one-loop SUSY-QCD corrections.
Findings
Reduction of renormalization scale dependence with one-loop SUSY-QCD corrections.
Enhanced perturbative stability with mixed on-shell/$ar{ m DR}$ scheme.
Uncertainty can be comparable to experimental errors in some scenarios.
Abstract
For particle physics observables at colliders such as the LHC at CERN, it has been common practice for many decades to estimate the theoretical uncertainty by studying the variations of the predicted cross sections with a priori unpredictable scales. In astroparticle physics, this has so far not been possible, since most of the observables were calculated at Born level only, so that the renormalization scheme and scale dependence could not be studied in a meaningful way. In this paper, we present the first quantitative study of the theoretical uncertainty of the neutralino dark matter relic density from scheme and scale variations. We first explain in detail how the renormalization scale enters the tree-level calculations through coupling constants, masses and mixing angles. We then demonstrate a reduction of the renormalization scale dependence through one-loop SUSY-QCD corrections in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
