Relating Graph Thickness to Planar Layers and Bend Complexity
Stephane Durocher, Debajyoti Mondal

TL;DR
This paper extends Fe1ry's theorem to graphs with higher thickness, demonstrating new methods to draw such graphs on multiple layers with reduced bend complexity, including sublinear bounds for certain classes.
Contribution
The paper introduces novel techniques for drawing graphs of thickness greater than two on multiple layers with significantly reduced bend complexity, including sublinear bounds.
Findings
Graphs of thickness t can be drawn on t layers with 2.25n+O(1) bends per edge.
A new method achieves bend complexity of O(0( ext{2}^t \, n^{1-(1/eta)})) for thickness-t graphs.
Graphs with linear arboricity k can be drawn on k layers with b3(k-1)n/(4k-2) bends.
Abstract
The thickness of a graph with vertices is the minimum number of planar subgraphs of whose union is . A polyline drawing of in is a drawing of , where each vertex is mapped to a point and each edge is mapped to a polygonal chain. Bend and layer complexities are two important aesthetics of such a drawing. The bend complexity of is the maximum number of bends per edge in , and the layer complexity of is the minimum integer such that the set of polygonal chains in can be partitioned into disjoint sets, where each set corresponds to a planar polyline drawing. Let be a graph of thickness . By F\'{a}ry's theorem, if , then can be drawn on a single layer with bend complexity . A few extensions to higher thickness are known, e.g., if (resp., ), then can be drawn on …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
