Teaching practices of graduate teaching assistants
Eric Hickok

TL;DR
This study observes graduate TAs' teaching practices in an early reform stage, highlighting their default behaviors and implications for TA professional development in interactive physics courses.
Contribution
It provides a holistic analysis of TA-student interactions using real-time observations, offering insights into TA behaviors during curriculum reform.
Findings
TAs tend to default to certain teaching behaviors
Observations reveal areas for targeted professional development
Early reform stage influences TA interaction patterns
Abstract
Physics education research has consistently shown that students have higher learning outcomes when enrolled in interactive-engagement courses. Consequently, many schools are actively reforming their introductory curricula. For courses where the interactive sections (labs, tutorials, and/or workshops) are mostly taught by graduate student teaching assistants (TAs), good TAs are instrumental to the success of the reform. Many studies have investigated specific interactions between TAs and students, but more can be learned through a holistic examination of TA-student interactions. Over the course of one semester, I observed TAs in their various teaching roles using the Real-time Instructor Observation Tool (RIOT). These observations serve to show what TAs may "default to" with little to no intervention. I present a snapshot of a department in the early stages of reform and discuss the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInnovative Teaching Methods · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Experimental Learning in Engineering
