A Geometric Analysis of Phase Retrieval

TL;DR

This paper proves that for generalized phase retrieval with Gaussian measurements, the least-squares objective has a benign landscape with no spurious local minima and negative curvature at saddle points, enabling efficient recovery.

Contribution

It establishes the geometric landscape of the GPR problem under Gaussian measurements, explaining why simple algorithms succeed without initialization.

Findings

No spurious local minima in the objective landscape.

All global minima correspond to the true signal up to phase.

Negative curvature at saddle points facilitates optimization.

Abstract

Can we recover a complex signal from its Fourier magnitudes? More generally, given a set of $m$ measurements, $y_k = |\mathbf a_k^* \mathbf x|$ for $k = 1, \dots, m$, is it possible to recover $\mathbf x \in \mathbb{C}^n$ (i.e., length-$n$ complex vector)? This **generalized phase retrieval** (GPR) problem is a fundamental task in various disciplines, and has been the subject of much recent investigation. Natural nonconvex heuristics often work remarkably well for GPR in practice, but lack clear theoretical explanations. In this paper, we take a step towards bridging this gap. We prove that when the measurement vectors $\mathbf a_k$'s are generic (i.i.d. complex Gaussian) and the number of measurements is large enough ($m \ge C n \log^3 n$), with high probability, a natural least-squares formulation for GPR has the following benign geometric structure: (1) there are no spurious local minimizers, and all global minimizers are equal to the target signal $\mathbf x$, up to a global phase; and (2) the objective function has a negative curvature around each saddle point. This structure allows a number of iterative optimization methods to efficiently find a global minimizer, without special initialization. To corroborate the claim, we describe and analyze a second-order trust-region algorithm.