Using Close White Dwarf + M Dwarf Stellar Pairs to Constrain the Flare Rates in Close Stellar Binaries
Dylan P. Morgan, Andrew A. West, Andrew C. Becker

TL;DR
This study compares flare rates of M dwarfs with close white dwarf companions to isolated M dwarfs, revealing higher overall flare activity in binary systems, which impacts understanding of stellar activity and planetary habitability.
Contribution
It provides the first statistical analysis of flare rates in close WD+dM binaries, showing increased activity compared to field M dwarfs, and discusses implications for stellar and planetary evolution.
Findings
Higher overall flaring fraction in WD+dM pairs (0.09%) than field dMs (0.0108%)
Lower flaring fraction for active WD+dMs (0.05%) compared to active dMs (0.28%)
Results constrain binary star flare rates and inform planetary habitability studies.
Abstract
We present a study of the statistical flare rates of M dwarfs (dMs) with close white dwarf (WD) companions (WD+dM; typical separations < 1 au). Our previous analysis demonstrated that dMs with close WD companions are more magnetically active than their field counterparts. One likely implication of having a close binary companion is increased stellar rotation through disk-disruption, tidal effects, and/or angular momentum exchange; increased stellar rotation has long been associated with an increase in stellar activity. Previous studies show a strong correlation between dMs that are magnetically active (showing H{\alpha} in emission) and the frequency of stellar flare rates. We examine the difference between the flare rates observed in close WD+dM binary systems and field dMs. Our sample consists of a subset of 181 close WD+dM pairs from Morgan et al. (2012) observed in the Sloan Digital…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
