Localization of enriched categories and cubical sets
Tyler Lawson

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the invertibility hypothesis for a monoidal model category of cubical sets follows from other axioms, simplifying the criteria for an excellent model category as defined by Lurie.
Contribution
It proves that the invertibility hypothesis is a consequence of other axioms in the context of cubical sets, reducing the complexity of establishing an excellent model category.
Findings
Invertibility hypothesis follows from other axioms in cubical sets
Simplifies criteria for Lurie's excellent model categories
Uses universal property of cubical sets
Abstract
The invertibility hypothesis for a monoidal model category S asks that localizing an S-enriched category with respect to an equivalence results in an weakly equivalent enriched category. This is the most technical among the axioms for S to be an excellent model category in the sense of Lurie, who showed that the category of S-enriched categories then has a model structure with characterizable fibrant objects. We use a universal property of cubical sets, as a monoidal model category, to show that the invertibility hypothesis is consequence of the other axioms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra
