Beamforming Errors in Murchison Widefield Array Phased Array Antennas and their effects on Epoch of Reionization Science
A. R. Neben, J. N. Hewitt, R. F. Bradley, J. S. Dillon, G. Bernardi,, J. D. Bowman, F. Briggs, R. J. Cappallo, B. E. Corey, A. A. Deshpande, R., Goeke, L. J. Greenhill, B. J. Hazelton, M. Johnston-Hollitt, D. L. Kaplan, C., J. Lonsdale, S. R. McWhirter, D. A. Mitchell

TL;DR
This paper investigates antenna beamforming errors in the Murchison Widefield Array, revealing significant deviations that impact Epoch of Reionization observations, especially in foreground subtraction within contaminated Fourier regions.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed characterization of antenna-to-antenna beam variation and its effects on EoR science, highlighting the need for per-antenna beam measurements.
Findings
Beamforming errors cause 10-20% deviations near main lobe edges.
Unmodeled errors limit foreground subtraction in the contaminated Fourier region.
Foreground avoidance remains effective despite beamforming errors.
Abstract
Accurate antenna beam models are critical for radio observations aiming to isolate the redshifted 21cm spectral line emission from the Dark Ages and the Epoch of Reionization and unlock the scientific potential of 21cm cosmology. Past work has focused on characterizing mean antenna beam models using either satellite signals or astronomical sources as calibrators, but antenna-to-antenna variation due to imperfect instrumentation has remained unexplored. We characterize this variation for the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) through laboratory measurements and simulations, finding typical deviations of order +/- 10-20% near the edges of the main lobe and in the sidelobes. We consider the ramifications of these results for image- and power spectrum-based science. In particular, we simulate visibilities measured by a 100m baseline and find that using an otherwise perfect foreground model,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
