The limitations of model-based experimental design and parameter estimation in sloppy systems
Andrew White, Malachi Tolman, Howard D. Thames, Hubert Rodney Withers,, Kathy A. Mason, Mark K. Transtrum

TL;DR
This paper investigates the challenges of experimental design and parameter estimation in complex biological models, highlighting how model inaccuracies and complexity can hinder predictive accuracy despite precise parameter estimates.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of sloppy systems and demonstrates that considering a hierarchy of models improves system identification over single-model parameter estimation.
Findings
Model error limits predictive power despite accurate parameters.
Complementary experiments can make omitted details relevant, causing model failure.
Hierarchy of models enhances system identification.
Abstract
We explore the relationship among model fidelity, experimental design, and parameter estimation in sloppy models. We show that the approximate nature of mathematical models poses challenges for experimental design in sloppy models. In many models of complex biological processes it is unknown what are the relevant physics that must be included to explain collective behaviors. As a consequence, models are often overly complex, with many practically unidentifiable parameters. Furthermore, which details are relevant/irrelevant vary among potential experiments. By selecting complementary experiments, experimental design may inadvertently make details that were ommitted from the model become relevant. When this occurs, the model will fail to give a good fit to the data. We use a simple hyper-model of model error to quantify a model's inadequacy and apply it to two models of complex biological…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
