The next detectors for gravitational wave astronomy
David Blair, Li Ju, Chunnong Zhao, Linqing Wen, Haixing Miao, Ronggen, Cai, Jiangrui Gao, Xuechun Lin, Dong Liu, Ling-An Wu, Zonghong Zhu, Giles, Hammond, Ho Jung Paik, Viviana Fafone, Alessio Rocchi, Chunnong Zhao, Yiqiu, Ma, Jiayi Qin, Michael Page

TL;DR
This paper reviews the development of next-generation gravitational wave detectors, emphasizing increased sensitivity, improved localization, and advanced technologies like quantum measurement and noise suppression.
Contribution
It proposes an 8 km armlength detector design, analyzes suspension and noise reduction techniques, and explores quantum measurement technologies for future gravitational wave observatories.
Findings
8 km detector sensitivity improved fourfold
High-performance suspension systems are essential
Quantum measurement technologies can enhance sensitivity
Abstract
This paper focuses on the next detectors for gravitational wave astronomy which will be required after the current ground based detectors have completed their initial observations, and probably achieved the first direct detection of gravitational waves. The next detectors will need to have greater sensitivity, while also enabling the world array of detectors to have improved angular resolution to allow localisation of signal sources. Sect. 1 of this paper begins by reviewing proposals for the next ground based detectors, and presents an analysis of the sensitivity of an 8 km armlength detector, which is proposed as a safe and cost-effective means to attain a 4-fold improvement in sensitivity. The scientific benefits of creating a pair of such detectors in China and Australia is emphasised. Sect. 2 of this paper discusses the high performance suspension systems for test masses that will…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
