Fast strategies in biased Maker--Breaker games
Mirjana Mikala\v{c}ki, Milo\v{s} Stojakovi\'c

TL;DR
This paper analyzes biased Maker--Breaker games on complete graphs, establishing bounds on the minimal moves Maker needs to win in perfect matching and Hamilton cycle games depending on Breaker's bias.
Contribution
It provides new bounds on the minimal number of moves for Maker to win in biased games on complete graphs, considering the bias's dependence on the number of vertices.
Findings
Bounds for Maker's minimal winning moves in Perfect Matching game.
Bounds for Maker's minimal winning moves in Hamilton Cycle game.
Results depend on Breaker's bias $b$ and the number of vertices $n$.
Abstract
We study the biased Maker--Breaker positional games, played on the edge set of the complete graph on vertices, . Given Breaker's bias , possibly depending on , we determine the bounds for the minimal number of moves, depending on , in which Maker can win in each of the two standard graph games, the Perfect Matching game and the Hamilton Cycle game.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
