Constructive Patterns of Logical Truth
Elnaserledinellah Mahmood Abdelwahab

TL;DR
This paper explores the logical and computational aspects of Arabic linguistic structures and Islamic jurisprudence, introducing efficient pattern-based algorithms for SAT problems and FBDD constructions, with implications for complexity bounds.
Contribution
It presents novel pattern-oriented procedures for 3-SAT and approximation algorithms for FBDD, linking ancient logical methods to modern computational complexity.
Findings
Efficient pattern-based algorithms for 3-SAT problems.
Polynomial-sized FBDD constructions for Boolean functions.
Polynomial bounds for FBDD nodes in finite projective plane problems.
Abstract
The simplified linguistic relation between syntax and semantics as intrinsic property of classic Arabic motivates a dedicated look at P vs. NP in light of efforts and solutions presented by ancient Arab- and Muslim scholars to facilitate logical- and mathematical deduction. In Islamic Jurisprudence (Fikh) it has recently been shown [Abdelwahab et al. 2014] that if a formal system expressing Fikh is chosen in such a way that it is both, logically complete and decidable, the question of a complete and consistent legislation is decidable. If this formal Fikh-system is additionally chosen to be at least as expressive as propositional logic, the deduction of detailed sentences is efficient while the deduction of general rules is NP-complete. Further investigation reveals that ancient scholars adopted a very efficient approach for checking the validity of assertions with regard to both,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Logic, programming, and type systems · Advanced Algebra and Logic
