Halo and Subhalo Demographics with Planck Cosmological Parameters: Bolshoi-Planck and MultiDark-Planck Simulations
Aldo Rodriguez-Puebla (1), Peter Behroozi (2), Joel Primack (1),, Anatoly Klypin (3), Christoph Lee (1), Doug Hellinger (1) ((1) University, of California, Santa Cruz, (2) University of California, Berkeley, (3) New, Mexico State University, Las Cruces)

TL;DR
This paper provides detailed halo and subhalo abundance functions, halo accretion rates, and galaxy-halo relations from Planck cosmology simulations, highlighting implications for galaxy evolution and observational consistency.
Contribution
It introduces new fitting functions for halo/subhalo demographics and accretion rates based on Planck cosmology, and analyzes galaxy-halo velocity relations and their evolution.
Findings
Higher matter density leads to more massive halos at high redshift.
Halo spin parameter is nearly independent of redshift, affecting galaxy size evolution.
Galaxy velocity relations must evolve at z > 1 to match observed stellar mass densities.
Abstract
We report and provide fitting functions for the abundance of dark matter halos and subhalos as a function of mass, circular velocity, and redshift from the new Bolshoi-Planck and MultiDark-Planck CDM cosmological simulations, based on the Planck cosmological parameters. We also report the halo mass accretion rates, which may be connected with galaxy star formation rates. We show that the higher cosmological matter density of the Planck parameters compared with the WMAP parameters leads to higher abundance of massive halos at high redshifts. We find that the median halo spin parameter is nearly independent of redshift, leading to predicted evolution of galaxy sizes that is consistent with observations, while the significant decrease with redshift in median predicts more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
