Quantile-based bias correction and uncertainty quantification of extreme event attribution statements
Soyoung Jeon, Christopher J. Paciorek, Michael F. Wehner

TL;DR
This paper introduces a quantile-based bias correction method for extreme event attribution, improving risk ratio estimates and uncertainty quantification in climate models, demonstrated on a US heatwave case.
Contribution
It presents a novel quantile-based rescaling approach to correct biases in climate model extreme event probabilities and constructs confidence intervals for risk ratios, including when estimates are infinite.
Findings
Lower bound of risk ratio is insensitive to event magnitude and probability
Method effectively adjusts for model-observation discrepancies
Demonstrated on 2011 US heatwave with Community Earth System Model
Abstract
Extreme event attribution characterizes how anthropogenic climate change may have influenced the probability and magnitude of selected individual extreme weather and climate events. Attribution statements often involve quantification of the fraction of attributable risk (FAR) or the risk ratio (RR) and associated confidence intervals. Many such analyses use climate model output to characterize extreme event behavior with and without anthropogenic influence. However, such climate models may have biases in their representation of extreme events. To account for discrepancies in the probabilities of extreme events between observational datasets and model datasets, we demonstrate an appropriate rescaling of the model output based on the quantiles of the datasets to estimate an adjusted risk ratio. Our methodology accounts for various components of uncertainty in estimation of the risk ratio.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
