Testing Gravity with Gravitational Wave Source Counts
Erminia Calabrese, Nicholas Battaglia, and David N. Spergel

TL;DR
This paper proposes a method to test the propagation of gravitational waves over cosmological distances using source counts, which can reveal deviations from General Relativity without needing redshift measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a new approach to test gravity by analyzing gravitational wave source counts and forecasts future constraints on deviations from standard propagation models.
Findings
Current data constrains the decay parameter gamma to be greater than 0.33 at 95% confidence.
Future observations with 100 events could measure gamma with 15% uncertainty.
The formalism accounts for a range of chirp masses and exponential decay models.
Abstract
We show that the gravitational wave source counts distribution can test how gravitational radiation propagates on cosmological scales. This test does not require obtaining redshifts for the sources. If the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR, ) from a gravitational wave source is proportional to the strain then it falls as , thus we expect the source counts to follow . However, if gravitational waves decay as they propagate or propagate into other dimensions, then there can be deviations from this generic prediction. We consider the possibility that the strain falls as , where recovers the expected predictions in a Euclidean uniformly-filled universe, and forecast the sensitivity of future observations to deviations from standard General Relativity. We first consider the case of few objects, 7 sources, with a signal-to-noise from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
