Resampling-based inference methods for comparing two coefficient alpha
Markus Pauly, Maria Umlauft, Ali \"Unl\"u

TL;DR
This paper develops resampling-based permutation and bootstrap tests to compare two Cronbach's alpha coefficients, providing more accurate control of type I error in small samples and non-normal data.
Contribution
It introduces novel resampling methods for two-sample comparison of reliability coefficients, improving small sample performance over existing asymptotic tests.
Findings
Resampling tests outperform asymptotic tests in small samples.
Proposed methods maintain validity under non-normality.
Real data applications demonstrate practical utility.
Abstract
The two-sample problem for Cronbach's coefficient , as an estimate of test or composite score reliability, has attracted little attention, compared to the extensive treatment of the one-sample case. It is necessary to compare the reliability of a test for different subgroups, for different tests or the short and long forms of a test. In this paper, we study statistically how to compare two coefficients and . The null hypothesis of interest is , which we test against one-or two-sided alternatives. For this purpose, resampling-based permutation and bootstrap tests are proposed. These statistical tests ensure a better control of the type I error, in finite or very small sample sizes, when the state-of-affairs \textit{asymptotically distribution-free} (ADF) large-sample test may fail to properly attain the nominal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
