Characteristics of Cherenkov Radiation in Naturally Occuring Ice
R.E. Mikkelsen, T. Poulsen, U.I. Uggerh{\o}j, S.R. Klein

TL;DR
This paper revisits the theory of Cherenkov radiation in ice, analyzing how ice crystal anisotropy affects radiation yield and angle, with implications for neutrino detection experiments like IceCube.
Contribution
It provides a consistent, error-free theoretical framework for Cherenkov radiation in uniaxial crystals, specifically applied to ice in neutrino telescopes, and assesses the impact of crystal anisotropy.
Findings
Anisotropy causes at most about 1% variation in Cherenkov yield and angle.
The effect is negligible for current detectors but relevant for future high-precision instruments.
Proposes an experiment to test the formalism and discusses anisotropy effects in lead tungstate crystals.
Abstract
We revisit the theory of Cherenkov radiation in uniaxial crystals. Historically, a number of flawed attempts have been made at explaining this radiation phenomenon and a consistent error-free description is nowhere available. We apply our calculation to a large modern day telescope - IceCube. Being located at the Antarctica, this detector makes use of the naturally occuring ice as a medium to generate Cherenkov radiation. However, due to the high pressure at the depth of the detector site, large volumes of hexagonal ice crystals are formed. We calculate how this affects the Cherenkov radiation yield and angular dependence. We conclude that the effect is small, at most about a percent, and would only be relevant in future high precision instruments like e.g. Precision IceCube Next Generation Upgrade (PINGU). For radio-Cherenkov experiments which use the presence of a clear Cherenkov cone…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
