Measurement of double-differential muon neutrino charged-current interactions on C$_8$H$_8$ without pions in the final state using the T2K off-axis beam
T2K collaboration: K. Abe, C. Andreopoulos, M. Antonova, S. Aoki, A., Ariga, S. Assylbekov, D. Autiero, M. Barbi, G.J. Barker, G. Barr, P., Bartet-Friburg, M. Batkiewicz, V. Berardi, S. Berkman, S. Bhadra, A. Blondel,, S. Bolognesi, S. Bordoni, S.B. Boyd, D. Brailsford

TL;DR
This paper presents the first flux-integrated, double-differential measurement of muon neutrino charged-current interactions on carbon without pions, using the T2K off-axis beam, providing data to test nuclear interaction models.
Contribution
It introduces a novel measurement approach that avoids model-dependent corrections for pion absorption, with two robust analyses demonstrating consistency and comparison with recent theoretical models.
Findings
Measurements agree with models including nucleon-nucleon correlations.
Total cross-section measured as (0.417 ± 0.047 (syst) ± 0.005 (stat))×10^{-38} cm^2 per nucleon.
Cross-section in high-efficiency phase space region is (0.202 ± 0.0359 (syst) ± 0.0026 (stat))×10^{-38} cm^2 per nucleon.
Abstract
We report the measurement of muon neutrino charged-current interactions on carbon without pions in the final state at the T2K beam energy using 5.734 protons on target. For the first time the measurement is reported as a flux-integrated, double-differential cross-section in muon kinematic variables (, ), without correcting for events where a pion is produced and then absorbed by final state interactions. Two analyses are performed with different selections, background evaluations and cross-section extraction methods to demonstrate the robustness of the results against biases due to model-dependent assumptions. The measurements compare favorably with recent models which include nucleon-nucleon correlations but, given the present precision, the measurement does not solve the degeneracy between different models. The data also agree with Monte Carlo…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
