On the Difficulty of Selecting Ising Models with Approximate Recovery
Jonathan Scarlett, Volkan Cevher

TL;DR
This paper investigates the fundamental limits of estimating Ising model graphs under an approximate recovery criterion, revealing that in many cases, approximate and exact recovery share similar sample complexity challenges.
Contribution
It provides new information-theoretic lower bounds on sample complexity for approximate graph recovery in Ising models, extending understanding beyond exact recovery scenarios.
Findings
Lower bounds match known bounds for exact recovery in many cases
Approximate recovery can be as difficult as exact recovery in minimax sense
Numerical experiments support theoretical bounds
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating the underlying graph associated with an Ising model given a number of independent and identically distributed samples. We adopt an \emph{approximate recovery} criterion that allows for a number of missed edges or incorrectly-included edges, in contrast with the widely-studied exact recovery problem. Our main results provide information-theoretic lower bounds on the sample complexity for graph classes imposing constraints on the number of edges, maximal degree, and other properties. We identify a broad range of scenarios where, either up to constant factors or logarithmic factors, our lower bounds match the best known lower bounds for the exact recovery criterion, several of which are known to be tight or near-tight. Hence, in these cases, approximate recovery has a similar difficulty to exact recovery in the minimax sense. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
