Polynomial Depth, Highness and Lowness for E
Philippe Moser

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new notion of polylogarithmic depth based on time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity, exploring its properties and relationships with highness, lowness, and complexity classes like NP and E.
Contribution
It defines polylog depth in complexity theory, establishes its fundamental properties, and connects it with highness, lowness, and the structure of NP and E classes.
Findings
Polylog depth satisfies key logical depth properties.
NP contains polylog deep sets if it does not have p-measure zero.
High sets for E contain polylog deep sets; low(E,EXP) sets can also be polylog deep.
Abstract
We study the relations between the notions of highness, lowness and logical depth in the setting of complexity theory. We introduce a new notion of polylog depth based on time bounded Kolmogorov complexity. We show polylog depth satisfies all basic logical depth properties, namely sets in P are not polylog deep, sets with (time bounded)-Kolmogorov complexity greater than polylog are not polylog deep, and only polylog deep sets can polynomially Turing compute a polylog deep set. We prove that if NP does not have p-measure zero, then NP contains polylog deep sets. We show that every high set for E contains a polylog deep set in its polynomial Turing degree, and that there exist low(E,EXP) polylog deep sets. Keywords: algorithmic information theory; Kolmogorov complexity; Bennett logical depth.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
