Direct versus indirect band gap emission and exciton-exciton annihilation in atomically thin molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe$_2$)
Guillaume Froehlicher, Etienne Lorchat, and St\'ephane Berciaud

TL;DR
This study investigates the photoluminescence properties of atomically thin MoTe₂, revealing layer-dependent emission characteristics, the influence of direct and indirect band gaps, and exciton-exciton annihilation effects at high excitation rates.
Contribution
It provides detailed analysis of layer-dependent photoluminescence and models exciton-exciton annihilation in monolayer MoTe₂, highlighting differences from related TMD materials.
Findings
Monolayer MoTe₂ has three times higher quantum yield than bilayer.
Emission from N≥3 layers involves both direct and indirect band gaps.
Photoluminescence intensity saturates due to exciton-exciton annihilation.
Abstract
We probe the room temperature photoluminescence of -layer molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe) in the continuous wave (cw) regime. The photoluminescence quantum yield of monolayer MoTe is three times larger than in bilayer MoTe and forty times greater than in the bulk limit. Mono- and bilayer MoTe display almost symmetric emission lines at and , respectively, which predominantly arise from direct radiative recombination of the A exciton. In contrast, layer MoTe exhibits a much reduced photoluminescence quantum yield and a broader, redshifted and seemingly bimodal photoluminescence spectrum. The low- and high-energy contributions are attributed to emission from the indirect and direct optical band gaps, respectively. Bulk MoTe displays a broad emission line with a dominant contribution at 0.94~eV that is assigned to emission from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
