Searching PubMed for articles relevant to clinical interpretation of rare human genetic variants
Andrew J. McMurry

TL;DR
This paper addresses the challenges in retrieving and standardizing evidence from PubMed articles for the clinical interpretation of rare human genetic variants, aiming to improve evidence sharing and query uniformity.
Contribution
It proposes methods to better extract, standardize, and share evidence from unstructured PubMed articles for clinical genetic variant interpretation.
Findings
Identified key barriers in querying variant evidence from PubMed
Developed approaches for standardizing variant annotations
Highlighted the need for collaborative evidence sharing
Abstract
Numerous challenges persist that delay clinical interpretation of human genetic variants, to name a few: (1) un- structured PubMed articles are the most abundant source of evidence, yet their variant annotations are difficult to query uniformly, (2) variants can be reported many different ways, for example as DNA sequence change or protein modification, (3) historical drift in annotations over time between various genome reference assemblies and transcript alignments, (4) no single laboratory has sufficient numbers of human samples, necessitating precompetitive efforts to share evidence for clinical interpretation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenomics and Rare Diseases · BRCA gene mutations in cancer · Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
