Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes. Part II
Sebastien Vasey

TL;DR
This paper proves that universal classes categorical in a sufficiently high cardinal are categorical on a tail of cardinals within ZFC, without requiring amalgamation or large cardinals, and provides explicit bounds.
Contribution
It establishes a categoricity transfer in universal classes under minimal assumptions and introduces machinery to transfer properties between classes, extending Shelah's work.
Findings
Categoricity in high cardinals implies categoricity on a tail of cardinals.
Universal classes have the amalgamation property above a certain bound.
The results hold in ZFC without large cardinal assumptions.
Abstract
We prove that a universal class categorical in a high-enough cardinal is categorical on a tail of cardinals. As opposed to other results in the literature, we work in ZFC, do not require the categoricity cardinal to be a successor, do not assume amalgamation, and do not use large cardinals. Moreover we give an explicit bound on the "high-enough" threshold: Let be a universal sentence. If is categorical in some , then is categorical in all . As a byproduct of the proof, we show that a conjecture of Grossberg holds in universal classes: Let be a universal sentence that is categorical in some , then the class of models of has the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
